If you're interested in becoming a contributor or requesting changes then click here to join the discord
Difference between revisions of "Consumer-BCI"
Landonodnal (talk | contribs) |
Landonodnal (talk | contribs) |
||
| (11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | <pre style="color: red"> | ||
| + | This and other linked pages have been imported from https://consumer-bci.fandom.com/wiki/Consumer_BCI_Wiki | ||
| + | </pre> | ||
| + | Consumer BCI technology is distinct from normal BCI technology in that it has a different set of priorities. BCI technology was for a long time restricted to research labs, and was cost prohibitive for any consumer purpose. With the maturing of [[EEG]] technology and new manufacturing processes for electrodes, a consumer-level price point is now achievable. For a more general background of BCI technology see [[Brain-Computer Interface (BCI)|here]]. Some Advantages/Drawbacks are taken from the [[EEG|EEG page]] . | ||
| + | [[File:Neurosky-necomimi-eeg-sensor-cat-ears.png|thumb|300px|Necomimi - a Consumer BCI headset designed to read the wearer's emotions and portray them through movement of the cat-ears.]] | ||
| − | + | ==Purpose/Priorities== | |
| + | *Be available for a cost accesible to the average consumer. | ||
| + | *Read brainwaves and use them to provide reliable input into a computer. | ||
| + | *Determine emotional response through brain waves. | ||
| + | *Display real-time EEG data. | ||
| + | *Easy to use with dry electrodes. | ||
| − | == | + | ==Advantages== |
| − | + | *Low-Cost (Neurosky Mindwave available for under $100). <ref> http://store.neurosky.com/products/mindwave-1 </ref> | |
| + | *Non-invasive, consumers do not want a surgically implanted prothetic for what is an entertainment device. | ||
| + | *Easy to use, normally implemented in an ergonomic headset design | ||
| + | *Well understood from its long history in the medical field | ||
| + | *Brings theraputic effects to the mass market (Meditation improvement, sleep pattern checking). | ||
| + | *Available at different levels of complexity/price to suit individual needs. | ||
| − | + | ==Drawbacks== | |
| + | *Quality of data is low compared to semi-Invasive (ECG) and invasive (Neuroprosthesis) methods. | ||
| + | *As a result, limited output channels (with bad data, trying to use too many channels will lead to overlap of commands and decrease in reliability of BCI). | ||
| + | *Accuracy of raw data with regards to actual nature of signals is disputed (separate to low quality of data, as training can hide this problem for gaming/control purposes, however for any diagnostic application, a device such as that in the video is completely useless). This is also a result of our limited understanding of [[brain waves]] . | ||
| + | *[[Safety Considerations for BCI systems|Safety issues]] still exist, and cost-cutting can increase risk. | ||
| + | *Limited by software interpretation of data. | ||
| + | ==Main Brands== | ||
| + | *Neurosky - Low cost C-BCI targeted under $100 | ||
| + | *Emotiv Systems -- Mid-range C-BCI at the $500 price range | ||
| + | *g.tec - High cost C-BCI at the $10,000 price range | ||
| + | The flagship product for each brand (Neurosky Brainwave, Emotiv Insight, g.tec Intendi.x) will be tested in the [[The Engineering Design Process|Engineering design process]] to place a quantitative evaulation on their respective quality. | ||
| − | == | + | Below is a quick summary of the key specifcations of three major C-BCI products. |
| + | {| border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" class="article-table" style="width: 500px;" | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | ! scope="row" style="text-align:center;"| | ||
| + | ! scope="col" style="text-align:center;"|No. of Electrodes | ||
| + | ! scope="col" style="text-align:center;"|Number of Output Channels | ||
| + | ! scope="col" style="text-align:center;"|Accuracy (compared to medical EEG). | ||
| + | ! scope="col" style="text-align:center;"|Cost | ||
| + | ! scope="col" style="text-align:center;"|Raw EEG available | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | ! scope="row" style="text-align:center;"|Neurosky Brainwave | ||
| + | | style="text-align:center;"|1 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:center;"|2 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:center;"|96% <ref> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGUMU537N4o </ref> | ||
| + | | style="text-align:center;"|$99 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:center;"|Y | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | ! scope="row" style="text-align:center;"|Emotiv Insight | ||
| + | | style="text-align:center;"|5 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:center;"|4 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:center;"|Not Given | ||
| + | | style="text-align:center;"|$500 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:center;"|N | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | ! scope="row" style="text-align:center;"|g.tec IntendiX | ||
| + | | style="text-align:center;"| | ||
| + | Variable - | ||
| − | + | Full 10-20 Mapping available. | |
| + | | style="text-align:center;"|8 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:center;"|98% <ref> http://www.intendix.com/ </ref> | ||
| + | | style="text-align:center;"|$12,000 | ||
| + | | style="text-align:center;"|Y | ||
| + | |} | ||
| − | + | ==References== | |
| − | + | <references/> | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 22:25, 19 July 2021
This and other linked pages have been imported from https://consumer-bci.fandom.com/wiki/Consumer_BCI_Wiki
Consumer BCI technology is distinct from normal BCI technology in that it has a different set of priorities. BCI technology was for a long time restricted to research labs, and was cost prohibitive for any consumer purpose. With the maturing of EEG technology and new manufacturing processes for electrodes, a consumer-level price point is now achievable. For a more general background of BCI technology see here. Some Advantages/Drawbacks are taken from the EEG page .
Purpose/Priorities
- Be available for a cost accesible to the average consumer.
- Read brainwaves and use them to provide reliable input into a computer.
- Determine emotional response through brain waves.
- Display real-time EEG data.
- Easy to use with dry electrodes.
Advantages
- Low-Cost (Neurosky Mindwave available for under $100). [1]
- Non-invasive, consumers do not want a surgically implanted prothetic for what is an entertainment device.
- Easy to use, normally implemented in an ergonomic headset design
- Well understood from its long history in the medical field
- Brings theraputic effects to the mass market (Meditation improvement, sleep pattern checking).
- Available at different levels of complexity/price to suit individual needs.
Drawbacks
- Quality of data is low compared to semi-Invasive (ECG) and invasive (Neuroprosthesis) methods.
- As a result, limited output channels (with bad data, trying to use too many channels will lead to overlap of commands and decrease in reliability of BCI).
- Accuracy of raw data with regards to actual nature of signals is disputed (separate to low quality of data, as training can hide this problem for gaming/control purposes, however for any diagnostic application, a device such as that in the video is completely useless). This is also a result of our limited understanding of brain waves .
- Safety issues still exist, and cost-cutting can increase risk.
- Limited by software interpretation of data.
Main Brands
- Neurosky - Low cost C-BCI targeted under $100
- Emotiv Systems -- Mid-range C-BCI at the $500 price range
- g.tec - High cost C-BCI at the $10,000 price range
The flagship product for each brand (Neurosky Brainwave, Emotiv Insight, g.tec Intendi.x) will be tested in the Engineering design process to place a quantitative evaulation on their respective quality.
Below is a quick summary of the key specifcations of three major C-BCI products.
| No. of Electrodes | Number of Output Channels | Accuracy (compared to medical EEG). | Cost | Raw EEG available | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neurosky Brainwave | 1 | 2 | 96% [2] | $99 | Y |
| Emotiv Insight | 5 | 4 | Not Given | $500 | N |
| g.tec IntendiX |
Variable - Full 10-20 Mapping available. |
8 | 98% [3] | $12,000 | Y |